Sunday, January 31, 2016

The Cyclist (1996, Mohsen Makhmalbaf - بايسيكلران)

In Kiarostami's masterpiece Close Up, the fake Makhmalbaf mentions this film as an example of the profound sympathy this director has for the poor and the underdogs. So, actually I was determined to like this film, but the real Makhmalbaf makes it really tough for me to feel anything for this movie.
There is the poor refugee from Afghanistan. He tries every means to raise money for his hospitalized wife. One time he tries rather clumsily to commit suicide by placing himself under a bus. Then he becomes he only attraction of an improvised circus. It is claimed that he can bicycle around the square a whole week. Wagers are made if he can it or cannot and also some dark mafia-like politicians try to sabotage his effort. Why these politicians are mingled into this plot,escaped my attention. In he end he wins, but like  another Sisyphus he just circles on.
Makhmalbaf uses  soap opera aesthetics for his film, which makes it almost impossible to watch. He uses also amateur actors, but their acting stays amateurish, never is lifted about the telenovela style. The wife for example tosses about the bed in the hospital and this is supposed to illustrate great pain. This is pain Ed Wood style. One thing is that the acting is minimalist throughout another thing is that the script never lets us enter beyond the poker face of the cyclist. No emotion, no sign of something going on inside the person.
The soundtrack places the movie outside Iran. I have read that this was a device to make the film pass through the censor board. Unfortunately also the music adds to the unbearable sentimentality of this film.
Certainly he tried to achieved something meaningful, but, I am afraid, that his capabilities cannot match his ambitions. I saw before his more recent film Sex and Philosophy. When I saw that, I thought that the absence of censors had emptied him for creative strategies, but now I see that there is not much to fetch here either. Makhmalbaf is just a wannabee poet in cinema.
2/10

Sunday, January 10, 2016

Feuchtgebiete (2013, David F. Wnendt)

Dies ist ein widerlicher Film nach einem (wahrscheinlich) widerlichem Buch. Ja doch, es war ein Erfolg und hat der Autorin zu Ruhm und Reichtum verholfen. Braucht man Geld, schreibt man irgendwelchen provokanten Schund und schon füllt sich das Konto. Die Strategie zieht immer, egal ob es Fanny Hill oder andere Schattierungen von öden Trübseligkeiten handelt.
Ich habe das Buch nicht gelesen, werde es auch nicht tun. Eigentlich ist auch das Leben zu kurz, um sich solche Filme anzutun, aber auch mich treibt die Neugierde gelegentlich dazu, auch solche Produktionen zu sehen.
Das Beste an diesem Film ist die großartige Carla Juri. Sie macht die unausstehliche Hauptperson dieses Films wenigstens halbwegs erträglich. Sie ist verhaltensauffällig und liebt vulgäre Äußerungen. Zuweilen kann sie sich aber auch anderes als den Unterleib thematisieren, etwa wenn sie dem Vater vorschlägt, sie könne schon mal mit der Trauerarbeit beginnen,damit der Schock bei seinem tatsächlichen Ableben nicht so groß wird. Hätte sie nur Provokationen dieser Art, würde sie es kaum in die Bestsellerlisten geschafft haben. Ja doch, sex sells.)
So werden denn also Feuchtgebiete der Anatomie und deren Aussonderungen mit Genuss umgegraben. Vielleicht ist dieser Film für pubertierende Mädchen interessant - ich hätte ihn entbehren können.
3/10

Sunday, January 3, 2016

Klovn Forever (2015, Mikkel Nørgaard)

Når man taler med danskere, vil man ofte høre den påstand, at de har en meget speciel humor. Det tør godt siges.
Jeg kender kun filmene med anti-heltene Casper og Frank. Jeg har ikke set tv-serien og jeg kommer nok ikke til at se den. Livet er for kort til at følge med i det hele.
I beskrivelserne af disse makværk læser man, at disse film er grænseoverskridende. Det er sådan set rigtigt nok, men at overskride en grænse, "provokere" eller udvide territoriet for den dårlige smag er ikke i sig selv hverken komisk eller humoristisk. Klovn filmene er fyldt med denne pruttepude humor.
Det eneste fælles interesse de to makker har, er deres interesse for fisse. Caspar som Casanova wannabee og Frank som ak så gerne vil underordne sig sin kones vaginale diktatur.
Filmen er en rapsodisk glasperlekæde af diverse pinlige episoder hvor plottet som sådan er på størrelse med en knaldperle.
Hvis filmen var sjov, kunne den være et fint monument over et venskab mellem to mænd - amicitia vincit omnia, men med denne nærmest maniske hige og søgen efter pinlige pointer bliver resultatet igen en tæerkrummende menagerie af småpinligheder.
Når den første Klovn film måske var sjofelt, så er denne her nok mest vulgært.
Ja, dansk humor erf noget specielt.
2/10


Kill Bill Vol. 1 +2 (2003 + 2004, Quentin Tarrantino)

IF I had seen these movies before,   I have completely forgotten about them. However, I have a faint memory that I might have seen the Japanese prequel to this film.
This is one film that comes in two parts and together it took away four hours of my collected life time. Four hours that are gone and will never return; time that I could have used to view something more edifying.
Tarrantino has his moments, sure. I think he is best with words. There is some verbal showdown, e.g. in Django Unchained that is  quite sparkling. This set of movies, however, is action-oriented. And therefore it has limits. I mean, how many times do you want to see splattering brains or oozing intestines. How many times is shooting and slashing interesting?
Of course, the genre puts limits. If you make a martial arts film, there will be fighting. It is a slashing ballet - one woman against a horde of crazy fighters. And other more or less imaginative ways how to put someone from life to death.
The intellectuals have noticed that Tarrantino plays with genres. Yes, he uses different styles. Indeed he does, and it is nice -- but it's still a tiresome plot we are dealing with. He is wrapping his material art in different papers. No matter how many times you unwrap it, there is still the same rotten content in it.
Quotations from B productions? Maybe, what is the use of this kind hiding Easter eggs? Yes, it can be tickling for movie buffs to find them again, but this is hardly a  quality in its own right.
Virtuosity - yes, but without a point.
So
Kill Bill Vol. 1 3/10
Kill Bill Vol. 2 4/10 -- for a script with somewhat more dialogue

Friday, January 1, 2016

The White Balloon ( 1995, Jafar Panahi بادکنک سفيد)

It showed that this was the right selection to view on a New Year's Eve; a film which is a countdown to the New Year. OK, it's the Persian New Year, but nevertheless.
I liked Taxi Tehran so much that I wanted to see more by this director. Taxi Tehran showed an overflow of irony and creativity. These same qualities we find again in his first feature film, but also an immense distress.
The film focuses around little Razieh, who wants to buy a chubby goldfish for the Noorooz celebrations. Now, I didn't know this before, but in Persian culture these fishes are a symbol for life. The skinny fishes at home are not enough for her. Thus Razieh is targeting for the plenitude of life. Her brother is going to help her and he talks their mother into letting her buy a fish, Happily she runs a way with a 500 toman bill. Although this doesn't sound much, it still was a substantial amount of money, as director Jafar Panahi declared in an interview.
Roaming on the street, Razieh becomes interested in the performance of snake charmers. She was told that this was unsuitable for her, but she also wants to know why it is not suitable for her. She manages to get rid of the money and get it back from the snake charmers. On the way to the fish shop she loses the money again. A friendly elderly lady helps her to find the money again, but it is now lost in a cellar duct. Her brother has been looking for her and together they try to acquire the bill again. At this point the tiny plot is overshadowed by a rich collection of supporting actors: a tailor who owns the shop next to the duct, the owner of the closed shop, a soldier who hasn't the money to buy a bus ticket to go home -- and a Hazara boy from Afghanistan, selling balloons. We saw this boy in the beginning when Razieh had disappeared from her mother. Then he had many balloons, now only a few are left.
Together they manage to get the bill out of the duct; the children run happily away, the seller remains with the white balloon, alone.
This film has been called heart-warming and life-confirming. Is it really like that? In Umberto D., one of the most touching dramas of Italian neo-realism, a living being whose life is even more miserable than the life of the eponymous main-character, helps him to return to life. That was solidarity among the outcasts. What do we have here? Selfishness! The two kids may be lower-middle class, and they use the Afghani seller for their purpose. Razieh's brother even thought that taking away things from him was OK, while he still has scruples to steal from a blind chewing-gum seller.
I have been told that the supporting characters were carefully cast from different parts of society: the tailor a Turk, the old lady a Polish refugee from the Gulag, the soldier and the fish seller from other parts. The snake charmers certainly also from abroad. What is the bottom line then? Maybe that a society needs all segments, if it is supposed to work as a society? It's a guess. However, it still seems to me that this film has an unhappy ending.
Busy viewers might think that the plot is moving too slowly. This is not Fast and Furious, but a chance to meet ordinary citizens from Iran. Panahi used only amateur actors and he has a unique talent to evoke the best of their performing abilities. They act naturally and this is quite amazing. Aida Mohammadkhani, the actor of Razieh is awesome: within seconds she changes from close to tears to happiness. It seems a pity that she didn't become a professional actress. The story is told from her perspective. We never see a general view from a grown-up perspective, but always close-ups that might confirm to the height of the girl. Especially in the beginning I sensed a certain impatience - until the film, so to speak, found its direction.
Unfortunately there are also cultural references that I cannot decode. E.g. Razieh once says that her father has two professions, but they don't elaborate on that any further. And there may be other allusions which I simply didn't catch. Likewise the foreign viewer has no chance to hear the different accents used by the characters, but none of these diminished the pleasure it was to see this film.
9,5/10